|

Home|
Immune System|
Transfer Factor Story|
Riovida |
Healing Process|
Testimonials|
Forms
The Story of Transfer
Factor
Transfer factors are small chains of amino
acids and bits of RNA that carry important information from immune system
cells to other immune system cells. They are like post-it notes that
deliver disease-related details to cells throughout the body. Existing and
newborn immune system cells come across these post-it notes, read them,
and then get to work. The information includes what threats to look out
for (bacteria, viruses, parasites, or even cancer cells), what to do about
them, and when to stop doing it.
Transfer factors were originally discovered in the late 1940s by a
tuberculosis researcher named Dr. H Sherwood Lawrence. While searching for
a way to protect people from tuberculosis, Dr. Lawrence took white blood
cells from a sick patient and injected the insides of the cells into a
healthy person. As a result, the healthy person became immune to
tuberculosis! Dr. Lawrence had no way of knowing what, exactly, conveyed
immunity, so he simply referred to it as "Transfer Factor".
In the decades since Dr. Lawrence's discovery, several important events
have taken place which have led to the sudden availability of transfer
factors to the public:
In the 1989, two researchers, Dr, Gary
Wilson and Dr. Greg Paddock perfected what was to become a patented
filtration process for the extraction of transfer factors from cow
colostrum. Through this extraction technique, pure transfer factors can be
collected in concentrated form, dried and then encapsulated for human
consumption.
In 1991,Dr. Sherwood’s work is
validated.
In the 1998, 4Life Research purchased
the patent, added a patent for a technique for extracting transfer factors
from chicken eggs, and began selling products containing transfer factors
to the public. These products are protected by the US Dietary Supplement
Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994
In 1999,The effectiveness and safety of
Transfer Factor supplementation was validated by scores of clinical
studies worldwide.
To recap, transfer factors were discovered in
1949 when a researcher used white blood cells from an infected human to
immunize a healthy person. But now we are able to extract transfer factor
from cow’s colostrum and chicken egg yolk making is available for public
consumption. How did we get from humans to cows and chickens, and why
would that work? It turns out that transfer factors are neither person nor
species specific, meaning that transfer factors generated by a human, a
cow, a dog, or even a chicken can be interchanged. They are like computer
files written in basic machine code, making them readable by any kind of
computer. Transfer factors represent a universal language that can be used
to directly control immune system activity.
The fact that transfer factors can be mass produced and are now available
to the public is extremely important. Perhaps the only thing more
important is the possibility that designer transfer factors could be made
for diseases like the H5N1 strain of birth flu, as suggested by Dr. Pizza
and his colleagues. If a cow or chicken were injected with the H5NI virus,
information about the virus would be contained in the colostrum or eggs
produced by the animal. They could be taken orally by humans - no
injection needed - and should, theoretically at least, prevent an H5N1
pandemic.
Transfer factors are not drugs and do not directly attack diseases. They
are supplements that augment immune system activity so that the immune
system can attack diseases. They do so safely with minimal side effect --
even when injected into people -- beyond mild flu like symptoms that
generally occur within the first few weeks of use. No serious
complications have been reported in any of the hundreds of papers on the
topic.
Transfer factors work very differently than pharmaceuticals drugs. Rather
than suppressing the immune system, or aiming at mechanisms used by
particular pathogens to survive, transfer factors help the immune system
take care of itself using a language that it understands inherently.
Boosting the immune system increases the odds that people can heal
themselves, particularly if transfer factors designed for specific
pathogens are used. Again, they work by helping the immune system do its
job. This is part of what makes them supplements rather than drugs.
Let's look at an example. In clinical trials, transfer factors have been
found to be superior to the drug acyclovir for preventing shingles
outbreaks. Only one of the two treatments, transfer factors, was found to
boost immune system health. Acyclovir aims at the virus itself. This is
fine, as long as your problem is just that virus and not the virus plus a
weak immune system. Indeed, advertisements for the antiviral drug, Valtrex,
which is converted to acyclovir in the body, indicate that the drug is
only for those with healthy immune systems. Many people dealing with
reoccurrences of viruses, like the herpes virus that causes shingles, are
doing so precisely because their immune systems are unhealthy!
To summarize, transfer factors are small molecules generated by immune
cells after dealing with threats. They are not species specific, meaning
that transfer factors generated by a cow's or chicken's immune system can
be read by our immune systems. Once they enter our bodies, they are picked
up and read by immune cells, which then follow the instructions and go to
work. They are not drugs, but supplements that help the immune system do
its job rather than directly attacking pathogens. This makes them quite
different from many pharmaceutical drugs, including antibiotics, that
directly attack disease causing pathogens without nurturing the immune
system in any way.
For years, transfer factors have been quietly
revolutionizing disease treatment and prevention. They allow the body to
heal itself, safely.
Beyond antibiotics — Using transfer factors to help defeat common ailments
and orphaned diseases, prevent pandemics and boost general health by
strengthening the immune system. Too good to be true?
Aaron White, PhD
We are coming to the end of a golden era in medicine, one in which
we can count on antibiotics to cure nasty bacterial infections and
outbreaks of all but a few potentially deadly viruses have been contained.
Unfortunately, drug resistant strains of bacteria have been springing up
faster than you can say “gonorrhea ” and everyone agrees that viral
pandemics are just a matter of time. It is becoming clear that we have
underestimated the role of viruses, and viral-like forms of bacteria (mycoplasma),
in everything from cancer to chronic joint pain. We have also
underestimated the importance of a healthy immune system in preventing and
beating current and emerging threats. In a way, this is good news, as real
progress can now begin. While drug company researchers work on novel drugs
to sell, one of our best hopes for the future of disease treatment and
prevention might rest in a discovery made more than 50 years ago –
something called transfer factors. Transfer factors are short strands of
amino acids and RNA that can tell newly born immune cells what to go
after, how to do it, and when to stop. Researchers have figured out how to
make custom transfer factors for essentially any disease with an
identifiable pathogen. They can be used to treat patients infected with
anything from herpes to hepatitis and protect those yet to be exposed. In
this review, we will discuss the discovery of transfer factors, research
regarding their potential value in disease treatment and prevention, and
examine unanswered questions regarding how and when to use them.
The immune system consists of a powerful army
of cells that wander around our bodies and brains, looking for potentially
disease-causing visitors, whether they are viruses, bacteria, fungi, or
parasites. Once found, these unwanted guests are destroyed or corralled so
that the harm they cause is minimized. Cells that detect foreign invaders
either destroy them or send for backup. Other cells move to the area to
help wage war against them. Newly created immune system cells are
recruited as soldiers in the wars. They are given instructions about what
to go after, how to recognize it, how to defeat it, and when to stop. This
story plays itself out everyday inside of our bodies. We only become aware
of the battles once they get ferocious enough to affect how we think and
feel.
|
A brief history of disease treatment from the Director General of
the World Health Organization (WHO)
In a fantastic overview of disease causing microbes and how they
have been treated across the ages. Dr. Gro Harlem Brundland, former
Director-General of the WHO, offers the following timeline
(attributed to anonymous):
2000BC – Here, eat this root.
1000BC – That root is heathen. Here, say this prayer.
1850AD – That prayer is superstition. Here, drink this potion.
1920AD – That potion is snake oil. Here, take this pill.
1945AD – That pill is ineffective. Here, take this penicillin.
1955AD – Oops…bugs mutated. Here, take this tetracycline.
1960AD to 1999AD – 39 more ‘oops’… Here, take this more powerful
antibiotics.
2000AD – The bugs have won. Here, eat this root.
Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance World Health Report on
infectious Diseases 2000. Message From the Director-General, WHO
Accessed December 13,2006. |
The discovery of antibiotics and
transfer factor
Several very important discoveries regarding immune system functioning and
health have been made in the past 100 years. In general, the emphasis has
rested on finding substances that can directly attack invaders, as is the
case with antibiotics and many antiviral drugs. Less emphasis has been
placed on ways to help the individual's own immune system deal with
foreign threats. Let's begin by looking at two such important discoveries
– antibiotics and transfer factors – and discuss how these discoveries
have affected the way that we deal with disease, and the roles they will
likely play in the future of medicine.
In 1928, in a laboratory in London , Alexander Fleming observed that a
common species of mold known as Penicillium was capable of killing
bacteria in Petri dishes. By all accounts, Dr. Fleming didn't intend to
discover an antibiotic. He returned to his lab after some time away and
found that the bacteria he was culturing didn't grow within a narrow zone
around the fringes of a pesky mold that contaminated his samples. He
probably wasn't the first to observe this phenomenon, but he was the first
to pursue an understanding of just how the mold prevented bacterial
growth. Dr. Fleming identified the component of the mold with
antibacterial properties and labeled it, “penicillin”. It would be another
15 years – during the 1940s -- before researchers realized the full
potential of penicillin and figured out how to turn Dr. Fleming's
discovery into a mass production treatment for disease. And so began an
era in which rates of death due to minor infections and communicable
bacteria plummeted.
In 1949, at a time when penicillin and the sulfa drugs, antibiotics
developed in Germany , were gaining reputations as life savers, a
tuberculosis researcher named Dr. H Sherwood Lawrence made another
important discovery in disease management. He extracted intracellular
fluid from white blood cells in patients who had been exposed to
tuberculosis (TB). He then injected the contents of these cells into
non-exposed patients. In doing so, he protected them from contracting TB.
He called the mystery components “transfer factor”, as they somehow
transferred immunity from one patient to the next.
At the time that transfer factors were discovered our understanding of
disease states was quite limited and the ability to extract transfer
factors for use in treatment beyond single cases was not available. The
miraculous effects of antibiotics were becoming widely known at the time
and they took center stage. Fifty years later, with improvements in our
understanding of disease states and vast improvements in technology,
transfer factors have now emerged on the scene as potentially powerful
weapons against disease – including diseases resistant to, or untouchable
by, antibiotics.
Immunologists suspect that transfer factors are small chains of amino
acids and bits of RNA that contain the instructions that the immune system
uses to recognize and fight foreign invaders and cancer cells. As new
immune cells are born, they pick up transfer factors and read them like
notes left by immune cells before them. Each time a person becomes ill and
their immune system learns how to battle a pathogen, transfer factors are
created and are used the next time around to make the battle against the
pathogen more efficient.
|
Heart disease and immune system health – Could viruses and
bacteria cause heart problems and stroke in some people?
According to recent information from the American Heart Association,
infectious disease could be the culprits underlying heart disease
and strokes in many people:
‘No one knows for sure what causes the low-grade inflammation that
seems to put otherwise healthy people at risk. However, the new
findings are consistent with the hypothesis that an infection –
possibly one caused by bacteria or a virus – might contribute to or
even cause atherosclerosis
Possible infectious bacteria include Chlamudia pneumoniae (klah-MiD’eah-ah
nu-Mo’ne-I) and Helicobacter Pylori (HeL’ih-ko-bak’ter pi-Lo’ri).
Possible viral agent include herpes simplex virus and
cytomegalovirus (si’to-meg’ah-lo-Virus). Thus, it may be that
antimicrobial or antiviral therapies will someday join other
therapies used to prevent heart attacks’ |
Research on transfer factors
In the last half-century, dozens of published studies have examined the
ability of transfer factors to treat and prevent diseases. Many of them
have been wildly successful while others have failed miserably.
Ingenious technological advances have rendered the use of human white
blood cells on a study-by-study basis unnecessary. This should allow for
rapid advances in the development of standardized protocols for utilizing
transfer factors in disease management. Researchers at 4Life Research that
is providing transfer factors to the public have taken advantage of the
fact that transfer factors are present in colostrum, the first fluid
released from a breast after child birth. This is true in humans, cows,
and other mammals. They are also present inside of chicken eggs. When
ingested by the offspring, transfer factors pass along instructions for
the offspring's immune system. They also stimulate the production of
Natural Killer cells, white blood cells always on the prowl for foreign
invaders and capable of destroying them without involving the rest of the
immune system.
Despite variability in methodologies and outcomes, decades of research on
transfer factors compels the assertion that transfer factors could be as
important as antibiotics for battling disease. Antibiotics only target
bacteria. Transfer factors can help the body fight bacteria, as well as
viruses and even cancer cells. They work by bolstering an individual's own
immune system so that it can deal with unwanted guests. They do not attack
diseases directly and can only improve health by helping the body do what
it's already doing. As such, they fall comfortably within the category of
supplements.
Transfer factors can now be custom made to assist the body in dealing with
specific, hard to treat pathogens – like oral and genital herpes,
shingles, cell wall deficient Lyme (a bacteria that can invade immune
cells and act like a virus), Epstein Barr (which causes mononucleosis),
cytomegalovirus, HIV and others. The true value of this treatment modality
is yet to be determined. However, if the past is any guide, the future
could be quite bright for this strategy and for those suffering from a
long list of diseases for which modern medicine currently offers little
hope.
|
If
transfer factors have that much potential in medicine, why haven’t
we heard more about them?
A search of the World Health Organization website on December
13,2006, for the term ‘transfer factor’ revealed zero accurate hits.
This show that medical dogma is slow to change. Transfer factors
were discovered at a time when the magic of antibiotics was just
being realized (late 1940s). Bacteria, and effects of antibiotics
against them are easy to see. Viral ailments are much harder to
understand, This, combined with the fact that the technology for
extracting transfer factors for use in medicine beyond a case by
case basis wasn’t available, led to a quiet celebration for their
discovery. That is, until recently. Researchers have since figured
out how to do two amazing things with transfer factors – extract
them from cow colostrum (first milk) and chicken eggs, and create
transfer factors for specific disease states, like herpes viruses
and Lyme. When ingested, transfer factors tell a person’s immune
system what to go after, how to do it and when to stop. It’s a safe
assumption we’ll be hearing more and more about transfer factor as
time goes by – but hold your breath! |
Let's look at a few of the bright spots in
the research literature.
1. When made to help the immune system fight against strains of the herpes
virus, transfer factors were found to be superior to acyclovir, an
antiviral drug sold by drug companies (Estrada-Parra et al., 1998)
2. Transfer factors diminish the number of relapses of genital herpes
(Pizza et al, 1996)
3. Transfer factors help AIDS patients beat cryptosporidium, a common
stomach ailment in this population (McMeeking et al, 1990)
4. Transfer factors lead to a reduction in the size of glioblastomas, the
most common type of cancerous tumors in the brain and spinal cord. (Pineda
et al., 2005)
Transfer factors and orphaned disease states
like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Multiple Sclerosis, post-Lyme and
Fibromyalgia
Currently, in addition to well-known and
aggressively treated ailments like cancer, members of the public and the
doctors that treat them are wrestling with a long list of diseases that
are poorly understood and for which no current, effective treatment
paradigms exist. Let's take a look at a few of them.
Lyme disease is caused by a tick born bacteria. If caught early, it can
usually be eradicated by traditional antibiotic therapy. However, if not
caught early, and even in some cases where it is, many patients go on to
develop troubling and persistent problems – like arthritis, facial
palsies, intermittent flu-like symptoms, and others. Once this occurs,
even IV antibiotics can be ineffective at bringing patients relief. In all
likelihood, this has to do with the fact that the Lyme spirochete can shed
its cell wall and set up shop inside of host cells, including immune
cells. They take on a form called mycoplasma and begin to function more
like viruses than bacteria.
Another so-called orphaned disease state is Chronic Fatigue Immune
Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS). Anyone who has suffered from this syndrome
-- characterized by cognitive impairments that can reach frightening
intensity (brain fog), widespread physical discomfort, dizziness upon
standing, aching fatigue, widespread back pain, poor sleep and other
symptoms -- has probably learned the hard way that Western medicine is
currently impotent at dealing with this condition, as well as related
conditions like fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis.
As we will see in a later section, pharmaceutical drugs for immune
conditions often suppress the immune system, leading to temporary relief
of symptoms but setting patients up for a progression of the underlying
pathology and perhaps making them much worse in the long run! See Amgen
and Wyeth's warnings about their immuno-suppressor, Enbrel, in the section
on "Disease Prevention". According to the company, taking the
self-injected drug Enbrel for arthritis can lead to multiple sclerosis and
a host of scary side effects. Similarly, cortisol-like products, including
Prednisone, bring relief from inflammation by suppressing the immune
system, setting the patient up for a laundry list of other disease states.
The current lapse in judgment on the part of MDs treating these conditions
is reminiscent of what happened in the early 20th century when the
American Medical Association (AMA) still recommended alcohol as a first
line treatment for snake bites. Indeed, use of alcohol as a medicine was
one of the reasons that the AMA opposed prohibition. There are several
reports of doctors treating snake bite patients with increasing doses of
alcohol until the point of death, only to blame the death on a failure to
successfully treat the patient's snake bite. Suppressing the immune
system, even at the risk of death, in order to treat symptoms of immune
flare up rather than getting at the underlying pathology causing the
immune flare up is equally misguided in my opinion.
In many cases, it appears that CFIDS sufferers -- as well as MS sufferers,
those with fibromyalgia and post-Lyme or post-viral sydromes -- exhibit
weaknesses in immune system functioning, perhaps combined with chronic
activation of some aspects of the immune system. Weaknesses in the immune
system place some sufferers at risk for becoming infested with pathogens.
Chronic activation of the immune system, presumably in an effort to deal
with these pathogens, could explain symptoms like diffuse back pain,
lethargy, depression, anxiety, and fatigue (see the subsequent section on
immune system activation and psychological well-being). In patients that
fit this profile, transfer factors have the potential to work wonders. In
a very small number of clinical trials, transfer factors have been found
to be effective for some sufferers of CFIDS – but, importantly, not
others.
A recent report by Dr. Nancy Klimas, a highly respected researcher and one
of the world's foremost authorities on CFIDS, and her colleagues suggests
that female sufferers can be sorted according to Natural Killer cell
levels (Seigel et al., 2006). Those with below normal levels tend to
exhibit greater levels of cognitive dysfunction, reduced drive, and
greater difficulties functioning during the day. It seems logical to
postulate that subjects in this subgroup might be particularly good
candidates for benefiting from the Natural Killer cell-enhancing effects
of transfer factors.
Relative to controls, a larger percentage of sufferers of CFIDS test
positive for active infections with HHV6 (one of eight strains of the
herpes virus). This virus is also present in the vast majority of
sufferers of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) who exhibit a pattern of relapses and
remissions, suggesting possible immunodeficiency in sufferers of this
syndrome, as well. While these viruses, and the immune activation that
follows, probably cause many of the symptoms of CFIDS , MS and other
conditions, these infections are primarily symptomatic of some more basic,
underlying problem in the individual. The nature of the underlying problem
varies from person to person, but immune system dysfunction seems to be a
common denominator. The role that transfer factors could play in
correcting these abnormalities is becoming more apparent as time goes on.
The study confirms the link between CFIDS and herpes viruses and
demonstrates that dealing with the viruses can improve the lives of those
who are ill.
Boosting immune system health could improve
psychological well-being, while immune dysfunction could underlay many
psychiatric conditions
|
The CDC finally creates a website about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
The Centers for Disease Control finally created a webpage about
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, more commonly known as Chronic Fatigue
Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS) or Myalgic Encephalomyelitis,
during the fall of 2006. The introduction begins with the following:
‘Managing chronic fatigue syndrome can be seen as complex as the
illness itself. There is no cure yet, no prescription drugs have
been developed specifically for CFS, and symptoms vary considerably
over time. These factors complicate the treatment picture and
require you and your health care team to constantly monitor and
frequently revise treatment strategies’
In my opinion, even if accurate, much of the content on the site is
unhelpful and effectively leaves sufferers exactly where they were
before the CDC launched its site – frustrated and felling hopeless.
How many sick people have a healthcare team? The original iteration
of the site included a statement that sufferers should avoid
supplement! Indeed, aside from anti-virus like Valycyte, supplements
are the only hope that such folks have for the time being.
The CDC is investing the mechanisms involved in CFIDS. Hopefully,
progress will advance quickly from this point forward. |
|
Post-exertional malaise in CFIDS
One of the most confusing and frustrating aspects of conditions like
CFIDS is that exrecise often exacerbates the problems rather than
promoting health. The CDC defines post-exertional malaise as:
‘relapse of symptoms after physical or mental exertion’
Post-exertional malaise effectively traps CFIDS
patients and confines the to light duties, if those are possible.
Research indicates that the immune system is activated (eg. increase
in NK cells) following exercise of moderate intensity – as in a
typical workout. Many sufferers of CFIDS show low NK cell levels at
baseline. Perhaps exercise, even at low levels, temporary
strengthens the immune system, allowing it to ratchet up its efforts
to rid the individual of whatever pathogens have set up shop. This
could lead to an increase in sick behavior and the experiences that
go with it.
Indeed, it is becoming increasingly clear that many CFIDS symptoms
are caused by immune system activation that flares up in an
unsuccessful effort to conquer one or more disease causing
pathogens. The end results is a chronic state of sickness that
actually worsens, at least initially, when the immune system is
activated.
For this reason, CFIDS sufferers taking transfer factors to help the
body deal with pathogens should expect to feel worse until the body
finally beats the pathogens back. How long this takes depends on how
healthy the body’s immune system is to begin with. |
Research has begun to elucidate the
relationship between immune system health and general feelings of
well-being. Researchers in Israel examined the psychological well-being of
teenage girls vaccinated for the rubella virus, a common cause of illness
in kids. This process involves injecting portions of the virus into the
body so that the immune system can learn to recognize it and protect the
person against it if it is ever encountered out there in the world.
Following such vaccinations, the immune system can become acutely active,
making people feel ill. Those that became slightly ill also became
slightly depressed! In the words of the authors, many of the vaccinated
girls “showed a significant rise in several standard measures of depressed
mood, as well as an increased incidence of social and attention problems
and delinquent behavior… Thus,
even a mild viral infection can produce a prolonged increase in depressive
symptoms in vulnerable persons.”
The same group of researchers took their investigations into the
relationship between immune system health and psychological functioning
one step further. They injected small portions of the cell walls from
bacteria into subjects, a technique commonly used to evoke an immune
response in humans in order to assess immune system health. Even though
the injected material caused no physical symptoms “The subjects showed a
transient substantial increase in levels of anxiety and depressed mood. In
addition, verbal and nonverbal memory functions were substantially
impaired.”
Another study of mood in young females after rubella vaccination found
similar results (Yirmaya et al., 2000). In the words of the study authors,
“compared to control group subjects and to their own baseline, a subgroup
of vulnerable individuals (girls from low socioeconomic status) showed a
significant virus-induced increase in depressed mood up to 10 weeks after
vaccination.”
Similar findings have been observed when subjects are injected with
cytokines, molecules released as part of the body's immune response.
Researchers at the University of Illinois Champagne-Urbana argue that
cytokines cause many of the symptoms of illness by acting directly in the
brain. Here's what they had to say in a recent paper (Dantzer and Kelley,
2006).
any psychiatric conditions
Cytokines “act in the brain to induce common symptoms of sickness, such as
loss of appetite, sleepiness, withdrawal from normal social activities,
fever, aching joints and fatigue. The fact that cytokines act in the brain
to induce physiological adaptations that promote survival has led to the
hypothesis that inappropriate, prolonged activation of the innate immune
system may be involved in a number of pathological disturbances in the
brain, ranging from Alzheimer's disease to stroke. Indeed, the newest
findings of cytokine actions in the brain offer some of the first clues
about the pathophysiology of certain mental health disorders, including
depression.”
Interestingly, antidepressants suppress production of some cytokines
(Diamond et al., 2006) and have been found to reduce the symptoms of
cytokine-induced depression (Yirmaya et al., 2000; Chiung-Wen Tsao et al.,
2006).
And so, it appears that activity within the immune system can have a big
impact on how otherwise healthy people think and feel. It therefore makes
sense that a healthy immune system contributes to psychological health and
well-being.
The immune system also seems to play a role in many major psychiatric
disorders. Researchers have long speculated that there are links between
immune system health and psychiatric conditions. Studies performed decades
ago suggest that exposure to certain strains of the flu virus during the
third trimester of pregnancy increase the likelihood that offspring will
develop schizophrenia.
A new category of pediatric ailments called PANDAS includes sudden onset
tick disorders and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and appears to be caused
by an autoimmune reaction. Specifically, immune cells seeking the strep
bacteria attack brain cells in an area called the basal ganglia. It is
possible that transfer factors could be engineered to help balance the
immune system in these individuals, perhaps leading to a diminution of
symptom intensity.
With regard to immune system health and psychiatric conditions,
Sperner-Unterweger (2005) states the following:
“ Treatment strategies based on immune mechanisms have been investigated
in patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders. Furthermore, some
antipsychotics and most antidepressants are known to have direct or
indirect effects on the immune system. Different immunotherapies have been
used in autism, including transfer factor, pentoxifylline, intravenous
immunoglobins and corticosteriods. Immunosuppressive and/or
immunomodulating agents are well established methods for treating the
neuropsychiatric sequelae of immune or autoimmune disorders, for example
AIDS and SLE. Therapeutic approaches in Alzheimer’s disease also apply
immunological methods such as strategies of active/passive immunisation
and NSAIDs. Considering the comprehensive interactive network between mind
and body, future research should focus on approaches linking targets of
the different involved systems.”
And with regard to the etiology and treatment of autism, Kidd (2002) tells
us:
“Autism and allied autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) present myriad
behavioral, clinical, and biochemical abnormalities… Immune therapies (pentoxifyllin,
intravenous immunoglobulin, transfer factor, and colostrum) benefit
selected cases… Current pharmaceuticals fail to benefit the primary
symptoms and can have marked adverse effects. Individualized, in-depth
clinical and laboratory assessments and integrative
parent-physician-scientist cooperation are the keys to successful ASD
management”
An immune system link would certainly help
explain the increasing rates of autism. According to the Autism Society of
America (www.autism-society.org), rates of the disorder are growing at
roughly 10-17% per year. According to an article in the Sacramento Bee,
researchers at UC-Davis estimated in 2003 that California was:
“...adding an average of 11 names a day to its list of severely autistic
children qualifying for state-financed services. The average lifetime cost
of these educational services is $4 million per child. As a result, the
increase in children eligible for services represents an increase in the
state's long-term financial responsibility of $44 million a day.”
Who knows what the underlying culprit is, but the potential to make
progress in the treatment of the disorder by putting funding into the
immune system link seems worth considering.
|
Laughter and Immune system health
Researchers at the Indianan State School of Nursing have reported
that having cancer patients view humorous programs leads to increase
in Natural Killer cell levels. In their words, ‘Laughter may reduce
stress and improve NK cell activity. As low NK cell activity is liked
to decreased disease resistance and increased morbidity in persons
with cancer and HIV disease, laughter may be a useful
cognitive-behavioral intervention.” (Bennett et al.,2003) |
Transfer factors and autoimmune
conditions—wouldn't activating the immune system make these conditions
worse?
Autoimmune conditions are those in which an
over-eager immune system attacks tissues that actually belong in the
“self” category rather than the “other” category. The consequences depend
on where the attacked cells are and what they do. On the surface, it seems
that doing anything that provokes immune system activity might make such
conditions worse. Yet, transfer factors have been recommended for, and
found to be effective at treating, several putative autoimmune conditions,
like rheumatoid arthritis (Georgscu, 1985). Mixed evidence exists for
their use in treating Multiple Sclerosis (Barsten, 1980). How does this
work? Transfer factors balances immune system functioning and regulate
autoimmune responses. That means Transfer Factor helps your immune system
to attack the foreign invaders by feeding it with the recognition codes and
calls back the army once the job is done. And with the discovering of
“NanoFactors” by 4life Research. The Tri-Factor formula with a higher
content of nano factors helps to fine tune the balancing or regulating
effect on the immune system. Decades ago, Hughes (1983) reported on
efforts to combat Multiple Sclerosis, a putative autoimmune condition, by
either suppressing or activating the immune system. Immune system
activation, including the use of transfer factors, seemed to be superior,
which defies logic when a simplistic view of the immune system is used.
Potential future uses of transfer factors
In the future, there's a chance this biotech
product will be used to help sick patients corral viruses like HIV, which
causes AIDS. Several studies, all plagued by methodological limitations of
one kind or another, have examined the potential utility of transfer
factors in the treatment of HIV. Several have found promising results,
particularly when transfer factors were combined with standard antiviral
drugs. With the advent of potent, stable preparations of transfer factors
from cows and chickens, it should be possible for the real work to begin.
Hopefully, in the near future, researchers will attempt to attack the HIV
virus using aggressive, well-planned dosing regimens of transfer factors
raised against the HIV virus in cows and chickens. If strategies used in
the past yielded positive outcomes, better findings should be possible
now. Time will tell.
One of the truly appealing aspects of using transfer factors for disease
treatment and prevention is that it circumvents the need to involve the
traditional pharmaceutical companies. Transfer factors are made to provide
alternatives to standard drug company treatment modalities. The products
fall well within the bounds of being considered supplements under the
DSHEA of 1994 and the company make absolutely no claims about the
effectiveness of these amino acid sequences in treating diseases. Nothing
stands in the way of private foundations purchasing and distributing
transfer factors to populations that could benefit from them, including
some sufferers of Lyme, CFIDS, MS, Fibromyalagia, HIV/AIDS and other
conditions. There are no guarantees that transfer factors would help
such folks, but the safety margin and cost effectiveness, combined with
the potential to improve the quality of life of those suffering from
chronic, immune system-related ailments warrants consideration. The
product cost about as much as a good multivitamin and is safe.
|
Enbrel as an example of how drug companies tend to
approach immune dysfunction
Enbrel is an injectable immunosuppresor advertised on television for
the treatment of arthritis. Clearly, drugs like this can be of
benefit for some people. For the purpose of this text box, it serves
as are example of the fact that conditions involving immune system
dysfunction can be attacked on a variety of levels. Improvements can
occur through two very different strategies – getting rid of the
underlying source of immune system activation, or through
suppressing the chronically activated immune system. Enbrel does the
latter.
Transfer factor have been found to be successful in treating
arthritis. It would be of interest to compare Enbrel, made by Amgen
and Wyett, and select formulations of transfer factors.
The safe margin for transfer factors is the only reason that this
approach would be preferably, but it’s a good reason. Enbrel and
drugs like it are not without complications. From the Enbrel
website:
‘What important information do I need to know about taking ENBREL?
ENBREL is a type of protein called a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
blocker that blocks the action of a substance your body’s immune
system maked called TNF. People with an immune disease, such as
rheumatiod arthritis. Ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis
and psoriases, have too much TNF in their bodies. ENBREL can reduce
the amount of TNF in your body to normal levels, helping to treat
your disease. But in doing so, ENBREL can also lower the ability of
your immune system to fight infections.
All medicines have side effects, including ENBREL. Possible side
effects of ENBREL include… Serious nervous system disorders, such as
multiple sclerosis, seizures, or inflammation of the nerves of the
eyes…
Rare reports of serious blood disorders (some fatal)…
In medical studies of all TNF blockers, including ENBREL, a higher
rate of lymphoma (a type of cancer) was seen compared to the general
population. The risk of lymphoma may be up to several-fold higher in
rheumatiod arthritis and psoraisis patients.
The role of TNF blockers, including TNF, in the development of
lymphoma is unknown.
ENBREL can cause injection site reactions.
In a medical studies of JRA, infections, headaches, abdominal pains,
vomiting, and nausea occurred more frequently than in adult. |
Transfer factors in disease prevention
In addition to helping patients beat diseases they have already
contracted, transfer factors could be used in ways similar to traditional
vaccines, protecting people against diseases before they've been exposed
to them. Indeed, that is how they were used in the first place when
discovered by Dr. Lawrence in the 1940s.
Researchers in China speculate that transfer factors will be useful in
treating and preventing hepatitis B (Xu YP et al., 2006). Researchers in
Italy recently made a similar argument for the use of transfer factors in
preventing and treating newly emerging strains of bird flu. According to
the authors (Pizza et al., 2006):
“Avian influenza…presents a threat of producing a pandemic. The consensus
is that the occurrence of such a pandemic is only a matter of time. This
is of great concern, since no effective vaccine is available or can be
made before the occurrence of the event. We present arguments for the use
of cell mediated immunity for the prevention of the infection as well as
for the treatment of infected patients. Transfer factor (TF)…has been used
successfully over the past quarter of a century for treating viral,
parasitic, and fungal infections, as well as immunodeficiencies,
neoplasias, allergies and autoimmune diseases. Moreover, several
observations suggest that it can be utilized for prevention, transferring
immunity prior to infection…Thus, a specific TF to a new influenza virus
can be made swiftly and used for prevention as well as for the treatment
of infected patients.”
Availability of transfer factors
No matter what one makes of transfer factors, it is truly a remarkable
development that researchers have figured out how to mass produce
them—from cow colostrums and chicken eggs, no less! — and that a
non-pharmaceutical company have brought them to the public.
For the time being, and for as long as drug companies and the FDA stay
within their bounds, and as long as the World Trade Organization doesn't
succeed in forcing member states to put more constraints on their
supplement industries, transfer factors are available as supplements. Some
are generic – they boost immune system functioning in general,
particularly Natural Killer cell levels. Others are specific or targeted –
they contain transfer factors that carry instructions that could help the
immune system locate and destroy specific pathogens, like herpes viruses.
Transfer factors appear to be very safe to take, with few adverse
reactions reported in any of the clinical studies in which they have been
used. Many users experience mild flu-like symptoms at some point within
the first month of treatment. This is generally taken as a good sign – an
indication that the immune system working. Symptoms of illness often
worsen before improving in those people for whom transfer factors work.
This has traditionally been seen as part of the healing process. If a
person feels ill because their immune systems are chronically activated
yet incapable of destroying the disease causing agent. Then jacking up the
immune system so that it can make a push to get rid of the pathogen is
certain to make some people feel more ill on their way to feeling better.
This is one of the paradoxical effects of recovery from viral illnesses
for some people — feeling better and worse at the same time.
Many antiviral and even antibacterial drugs pushed by drug companies
cannot boast similar safety profiles. Some anti-virals are known cause
liver failure, and serious side effects from antibiotics are more common
than many might realize.
Transfer Factors are currently manufactured and sold by 4Life Research.
|
Transfer factors and food allergies
Transfer factors are extracted from cows colostrums and chicken eggs.
What about people who are allergic to both for some reason? The
components of milk and eggs that might cause allergies are all
filtered out. |
The size of transfer factors and their
absorption following oral administration
Transfer factors, growth hormones, and other important constituents of
colostrums are swallowed by infants and absorbed intact via the digestive
system. However, the digestive systems of newborns are not complete,
creating a window of opportunity for getting these things in.
Of import is whether the short-chains of amino acids that comprise
transfer factors are absorbed into the body intact following oral
administration or are broken down during digestion in the stomach and
intestines. The technological advances that have allowed these immune
boosters to be sold in powdered form and taken orally are only valuable if
the end product gets into the body and becomes bioavailable.
As discussed, transfer factors appear to be, primarily, chains of amino
acids. Amino acids are strung together into short chains (peptides) and
long chains (proteins). During digestion, proteins are broken down into
amino acids, dipeptides (a pair of amino acids) and tripeptides (three
amino acids together) by enzymes called proteases and peptidases. While
two or three amino acids might not sound like a lot, some important
peptides in the body are, in fact, that short. Glutathione, an
antioxidant, and thyrotropin releasing hormone, a hormone central to
thyroid functioning, are only three amino acids long.
In some people — lots of people, in fact — gaps between cells lining the
gastrointestinal tract are too large, allowing proteins, bacteria, toxins
and other large molecules to get in. The problem is called “leaky gut”. As
such, these molecules get into the body and are then attacked by the
immune system. Food allergies, such as peanut allergies, can result. While
these gaps could help absorption of important meds, the constant presence
of these gaps causes lots of problems.
Researchers are currently working on ways to make the gut leaky
temporarily so that supplements and drugs can be absorbed more fully.
In 2000, Kirkpartrick wrote that, “... However, recent studies have shown
that transfer factors can be purified to a high degree of homogeneity and
that the purified transfer factors are proteinaceous and immunologically
specific.”
Transfer factors are thought to have a molecular weight of about 5000
Daltons (Da). For reference, Tryptophan is the heaviest individual amino
acid at 204.22 Da.
Oral transfer factors seem to work, which provides compelling anecdotal
evidence that they do get absorbed and become bioavailable. Indeed, the
flu-like symptoms that often result from their use clearly indicate that
enough of the supplement gets in to activate the immune system.
|
A putative role for insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) in the
pathophysiology of shingles, Alzheimer’s and diabetes.
Many adults are revisited by the herpes virus that causes chicken
pox. But this time in a more painful way. After being beaten back by
childhood immune systems, the virus hides inside of nerve cells,
including cells that pick up sensory information from the skin. When
under stress, when the skin is damaged, when ill with other
conditions, the opportunistic virus comes our of the ends of the
nerves near the skin. It invades skin cells and causes them to
erupt, leading to the painful patches of blisters for which the
disease is known. Sensory nerves carry information from discrete
areas of skin called dermatomes (imagine having a lower back brace
on, that would represent something like a dermatome). Because of
this, shingles outbreaks can have well-defined borders.
This fall, Drs, Jeffrey Cohen and Quinxeue Li researchers at the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease reported a very
interesting finding. The shingles virus gets inside of cells by
attaching to an enzyme called insulin degrading enzyme (IDE). It
literally catches a ride on IDE when this enzyme enters cells.
Insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) is an interesting thing. It is an
enzyme that seems to play a role in several disease states. As
discussed above, it serves as the gateway into cells for shingles.
Theoretically, without any IDE whatsoever, on one would get
shingles. Even if that were possible, too little IDE might be worse.
We need IDE to regulate levels of three other proteins involved in
disease – Beat-Amyloid Precusor Proetein (d-APP), insulin, and
amylin.
- High levels of b-APP are involved in the pathogenesis of
Alzheimer’s
- Too much insulin can cause diabetes.
- Deposits containing amylin are found in dead pancreas cells in
people with Type II diabetes.
Levels of all three proteins are regulate by IDE. There is some
speculation that an allele for the genes that carries the
instructions for how to make IDE could lead to too little IDE,
raising the levels of b-APP, insulin and amylin, and increasing
one’s odds of Alzheimer’s and diabetes (Farris et al., 2003)
When insulin levels goes up, IDE levels go up because something
needs to break the insulin down (Zhao et al., 2004) Zhao and
colleagues (2004) provide evidence that activation of insulin
receptors leads to a downstream increase in IDE levels.
This keeps the system in check. In Type II diabetes, the scenario
might work like this. Chronically activating insulin receptors via
sugar intake leads to them to become desensitized. If they’re
desensitized, then, presumably, less IDE would be created. As we
have discussed, less IDE could lead to amylin deposits in pancreas
b-cells and high insulin levels seen in diabetes.
Because IDE breaks down b-APP cells, IDE associated with diabetes
could also lead to more b-APP, which would increase the odds of
Alzheimer’s. This fits nicely with recent report suggesting that,
“type II diabetes predicted the development of dementia and
Alzheimer’s (University of Michigan News Service, March 13,2006) |
Home|
Immune System|
Transfer Factor Story|
Riovida |
Healing Process|
Testimonials|
Forms |
Chinese
 |